mWH is correct, as the capacity of battery is mAH.Exurban wrote: Sat Mar 27, 2021 3:12 pm Should have said mW, not mWH. And even if you drop the LI nominal voltage to 3.6 and bump the NiMH up to 1.25, the LI pack still has more capacity.
Battery pack vs AA pack
-
felix750
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2021 6:21 am
Re: Battery pack vs AA pack
-
Exurban
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2020 12:07 pm
Re: Battery pack vs AA pack
Thanks. I don’t know why I confused myself and I try to use the correct terminology. Was going to correct myself a second time but I didn’t think anyone read any of the few posts I made. I think I least got the numbers right.
-
Themistokles
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 7:47 am
Re: Battery pack vs AA pack
No, it's the other way around. When we speak about capacity, we are talking about mWh. But you should have said mAh instead of mAExurban wrote: Sat Mar 27, 2021 3:12 pm Should have said mW, not mWH. And even if you drop the LI nominal voltage to 3.6 and bump the NiMH up to 1.25, the LI pack still has more capacity.
Best regards,
Themistokles
-
Themistokles
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 7:47 am
-
Themistokles
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2019 7:47 am
Re: Battery pack vs AA pack
@Moderators
Thanks for moving my last post, but ...
At the new location, I guess it is misleading, because it is out of context. It was really intended as a reply in exactly this thread in the Montana 7x0 forum. I just wanted to say that it probably generally leads to wrong results if we believe the pure theory and the capacity ratings (although I have done the measurements I mentioned using another device). In other words, I just referred to the behavior of another device to give a general answer to the OP's question in this thread.
Thank you very much, and best regards,
Themistokles
Thanks for moving my last post, but ...
At the new location, I guess it is misleading, because it is out of context. It was really intended as a reply in exactly this thread in the Montana 7x0 forum. I just wanted to say that it probably generally leads to wrong results if we believe the pure theory and the capacity ratings (although I have done the measurements I mentioned using another device). In other words, I just referred to the behavior of another device to give a general answer to the OP's question in this thread.
Thank you very much, and best regards,
Themistokles
